Algeria vs Bangladesh: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Algeria
- Bangladesh
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0.2829 against 0.2679 in Algeria, a difference of 0.015.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Algeria ranks 127th and Bangladesh ranks 124th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Bangladesh in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2204 | 0.2212 | 0.0008 | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 0.229 | 0.2011 | 0.0279 | Algeria |
| 2000s | 0.2276 | 0.2132 | 0.0144 | Algeria |
| 2010s | 0.2508 | 0.2673 | 0.0165 | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0.2679 | 0.2829 | 0.015 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Algeria or Bangladesh?
- Bangladesh, at 0.2829 against 0.2679 in Algeria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Algeria and Bangladesh?
- 0.015, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Bangladesh?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Algeria and Bangladesh rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Algeria ranks 127th and Bangladesh ranks 124th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.