Argentina vs Kazakhstan: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Argentina
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 0.3899 against 0.3831 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0068.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 100th and Kazakhstan ranks 101st of 183 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2381 | 0 | 0.2381 | Argentina |
| 1990s | 0.2225 | 0.1172 | 0.1053 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 0.2831 | 0.2354 | 0.0477 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 0.3569 | 0.3494 | 0.0074 | Argentina |
| 2020s | 0.3899 | 0.3831 | 0.0067 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Argentina or Kazakhstan?
- Argentina, at 0.3899 against 0.3831 in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0068, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kazakhstan rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Argentina ranks 100th and Kazakhstan ranks 101st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.