Belarus, Republic of vs Eswatini: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Belarus, Republic of
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.2926 against 0.2862 in Belarus, Republic of, a difference of 0.0064.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Eswatini ahead.
Belarus, Republic of ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 120th of 183 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus, Republic of | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.2042 | 0.2042 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.0743 | 0.1911 | 0.1168 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.1815 | 0.2172 | 0.0357 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.2774 | 0.2879 | 0.0106 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.2862 | 0.2926 | 0.0063 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Belarus, Republic of or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.2926 against 0.2862 in Belarus, Republic of as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Belarus, Republic of and Eswatini?
- 0.0064, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus, Republic of and Eswatini?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Belarus, Republic of and Eswatini rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Belarus, Republic of ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 120th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.