Belgium vs New Zealand: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Belgium
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.7821 against 0.7435 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0386.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was New Zealand ahead.
Belgium ranks 13th and New Zealand ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4481 | 0.4551 | 0.007 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 0.7426 | 0.6541 | 0.0885 | Belgium |
| 2000s | 0.8032 | 0.6774 | 0.1259 | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0.807 | 0.7305 | 0.0765 | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0.7821 | 0.7435 | 0.0386 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Belgium or New Zealand?
- Belgium, at 0.7821 against 0.7435 in New Zealand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Belgium and New Zealand?
- 0.0386, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Zealand?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and New Zealand rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Belgium ranks 13th and New Zealand ranks 15th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.