Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Czechia: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.5074 against 0.5035 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0039.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 60th and Czechia ranks 58th of 183 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.129 | 0.4336 | 0.3046 | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.3092 | 0.4282 | 0.119 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.4813 | 0.5136 | 0.0323 | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.5035 | 0.5074 | 0.0038 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 0.5074 against 0.5035 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechia?
- 0.0039, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechia rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 60th and Czechia ranks 58th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.