Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.5127 against 0.5052 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0075.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 57th and Mongolia ranks 59th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4184 | 0 | 0.4184 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.2661 | 0.1794 | 0.0867 | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.3558 | 0.3533 | 0.0025 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.4809 | 0.5475 | 0.0666 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.5127 | 0.5052 | 0.0074 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 0.5127 against 0.5052 in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 0.0075, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Costa Rica ranks 57th and Mongolia ranks 59th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.