Gambia vs Solomon Islands: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Gambia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0.1837 against 0.1825 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0012.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Gambia ranks 166th and Solomon Islands ranks 167th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1942 | 0.2981 | 0.104 | Solomon Islands |
| 1990s | 0.1786 | 0.2454 | 0.0668 | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 0.162 | 0.18 | 0.018 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 0.1748 | 0.1747 | 0.0001 | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.1837 | 0.1825 | 0.0013 | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Gambia or Solomon Islands?
- Gambia, at 0.1837 against 0.1825 in Solomon Islands as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Gambia and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0012, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Solomon Islands?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Gambia and Solomon Islands rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Gambia ranks 166th and Solomon Islands ranks 167th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.