Guatemala vs Indonesia: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Guatemala
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.4023 against 0.4002 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0021.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 97th and Indonesia ranks 96th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4313 | 0.1851 | 0.2461 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.2799 | 0.2584 | 0.0215 | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.317 | 0.2574 | 0.0595 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.4287 | 0.3879 | 0.0407 | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.4002 | 0.4023 | 0.0021 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Guatemala or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 0.4023 against 0.4002 in Guatemala as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Guatemala and Indonesia?
- 0.0021, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Indonesia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Guatemala and Indonesia rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Guatemala ranks 97th and Indonesia ranks 96th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.