Kuwait vs North Macedonia: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Kuwait
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.4893 against 0.4798 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.0095.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 67th and North Macedonia ranks 64th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.3319 | 0 | 0.3319 | Kuwait |
| 1990s | 0.3467 | 0.2186 | 0.1281 | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 0.386 | 0.3156 | 0.0705 | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 0.4423 | 0.4679 | 0.0257 | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.4798 | 0.4893 | 0.0096 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Kuwait or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 0.4893 against 0.4798 in Kuwait as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Kuwait and North Macedonia?
- 0.0095, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and North Macedonia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kuwait and North Macedonia rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Kuwait ranks 67th and North Macedonia ranks 64th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.