Mali vs Papua New Guinea: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Mali
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.2482 against 0.2391 in Mali, a difference of 0.0091.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 137th and Papua New Guinea ranks 134th of 183 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1827 | 0.2409 | 0.0582 | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 0.1595 | 0.2165 | 0.057 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.1722 | 0.2226 | 0.0504 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.2079 | 0.2439 | 0.036 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.2391 | 0.2482 | 0.0091 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Mali or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 0.2482 against 0.2391 in Mali as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Mali and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0091, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Papua New Guinea?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Mali and Papua New Guinea rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Mali ranks 137th and Papua New Guinea ranks 134th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.