Advanced Markets vs Norway: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Advanced Markets
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0.9421 against 0.5504 in Advanced Markets, a difference of 0.3917.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.7 times Advanced Markets's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Norway ahead.
Advanced Markets ranks 1st and Norway ranks 4th of 9 groups.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Advanced Markets | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1926 | 0.3695 | 0.1769 | Norway |
| 1990s | 0.3338 | 0.4288 | 0.0951 | Norway |
| 2000s | 0.5099 | 0.8931 | 0.3832 | Norway |
| 2010s | 0.5247 | 0.9691 | 0.4444 | Norway |
| 2020s | 0.5504 | 0.9421 | 0.3916 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Advanced Markets or Norway?
- Norway, at 0.9421 against 0.5504 in Advanced Markets as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Advanced Markets and Norway?
- 0.3917, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Advanced Markets and Norway?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Advanced Markets and Norway rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Advanced Markets ranks 1st and Norway ranks 4th of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.