Australia vs Mauritius: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Australia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.7611 against 0.7166 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0445.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritius ahead.
Australia ranks 14th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2548 | 0.5489 | 0.2941 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 0.399 | 0.547 | 0.148 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.7471 | 0.5347 | 0.2123 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.7878 | 0.5585 | 0.2293 | Australia |
| 2020s | 0.7611 | 0.7166 | 0.0445 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Australia or Mauritius?
- Australia, at 0.7611 against 0.7166 in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Australia and Mauritius?
- 0.0445, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mauritius?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Mauritius rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Australia ranks 14th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.