Azerbaijan vs Slovakia: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Azerbaijan
- Slovakia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0.0197 against 0.0181 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.0016.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Slovakia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 91st and Slovakia ranks 92nd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.0136 | 0.0238 | 0.0103 | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 0.0162 | 0.0457 | 0.0295 | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 0.0132 | 0.0323 | 0.0191 | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 0.0197 | 0.0181 | 0.0016 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Azerbaijan or Slovakia?
- Azerbaijan, at 0.0197 against 0.0181 in Slovakia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Azerbaijan and Slovakia?
- 0.0016, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Slovakia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Azerbaijan and Slovakia rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Azerbaijan ranks 91st and Slovakia ranks 92nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.