Belarus vs Bolivia: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Belarus
- Bolivia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.0109 against 0.0097 in Bolivia, a difference of 0.0012.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bolivia ahead.
Belarus ranks 101st and Bolivia ranks 102nd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Bolivia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Bolivia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0126 | 0.0126 | Bolivia |
| 1990s | 0.0071 | 0.015 | 0.0079 | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 0.0259 | 0.0166 | 0.0094 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.0104 | 0.0159 | 0.0055 | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 0.0109 | 0.0097 | 0.0012 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Belarus or Bolivia?
- Belarus, at 0.0109 against 0.0097 in Bolivia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Belarus and Bolivia?
- 0.0012, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bolivia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Bolivia rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Belarus ranks 101st and Bolivia ranks 102nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.