Bulgaria vs Lithuania: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Bulgaria
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0778 against 0.0627 in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.0151.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Bulgaria's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Lithuania ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 79th and Lithuania ranks 77th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0024 | 0 | 0.0024 | Bulgaria |
| 1990s | 0.012 | 0.0448 | 0.0328 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.0183 | 0.0641 | 0.0458 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.0292 | 0.0488 | 0.0196 | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.0627 | 0.0778 | 0.015 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Bulgaria or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.0778 against 0.0627 in Bulgaria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Bulgaria and Lithuania?
- 0.0151, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Lithuania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bulgaria and Lithuania rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Bulgaria ranks 79th and Lithuania ranks 77th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.