China vs Indonesia: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- China
- Indonesia
How they compare
China currently reports 0.37 against 0.3447 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0253.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Indonesia ahead.
China ranks 58th and Indonesia ranks 60th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0561 | 0.3501 | 0.2939 | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 0.1035 | 0.3257 | 0.2221 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.1738 | 0.3637 | 0.1899 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0.2439 | 0.3253 | 0.0814 | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 0.37 | 0.3447 | 0.0253 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, China or Indonesia?
- China, at 0.37 against 0.3447 in Indonesia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between China and Indonesia?
- 0.0253, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Indonesia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do China and Indonesia rank globally for financial markets access index?
- China ranks 58th and Indonesia ranks 60th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.