Colombia vs Kazakhstan: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Colombia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0.5397 against 0.5353 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0044.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 29th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0799 | 0 | 0.0799 | Colombia |
| 1990s | 0.1309 | 0.2247 | 0.0938 | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.4061 | 0.5637 | 0.1575 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.5223 | 0.5258 | 0.0035 | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.5397 | 0.5353 | 0.0044 | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Colombia or Kazakhstan?
- Colombia, at 0.5397 against 0.5353 in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Colombia and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0044, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Kazakhstan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Kazakhstan rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Colombia ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 29th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.