Costa Rica vs Georgia: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Costa Rica
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.0283 against 0.0198 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0085.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 90th and Georgia ranks 87th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0356 | 0 | 0.0356 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.0332 | 0.0076 | 0.0256 | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.0275 | 0.0261 | 0.0014 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.0361 | 0.0361 | 0.0001 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.0198 | 0.0283 | 0.0085 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Costa Rica or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 0.0283 against 0.0198 in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Costa Rica and Georgia?
- 0.0085, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Georgia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Georgia rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Costa Rica ranks 90th and Georgia ranks 87th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.