El Salvador vs Tunisia: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- El Salvador
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.0179 against 0.0166 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0013.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Tunisia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0063 | 0.0165 | 0.0102 | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 0.0125 | 0.0158 | 0.0034 | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.0201 | 0.0152 | 0.0049 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0.0202 | 0.0121 | 0.0081 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 0.0166 | 0.0179 | 0.0013 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, El Salvador or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.0179 against 0.0166 in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between El Salvador and Tunisia?
- 0.0013, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Tunisia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do El Salvador and Tunisia rank globally for financial markets access index?
- El Salvador ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.