Georgia vs Jamaica: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Georgia
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.0347 against 0.0283 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0064.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Jamaica ahead.
Georgia ranks 87th and Jamaica ranks 84th of 183 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0474 | 0.0474 | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 0.0076 | 0.0456 | 0.038 | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 0.0261 | 0.0707 | 0.0446 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 0.0361 | 0.0437 | 0.0076 | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 0.0283 | 0.0347 | 0.0064 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Georgia or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 0.0347 against 0.0283 in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Georgia and Jamaica?
- 0.0064, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Jamaica?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Jamaica rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Georgia ranks 87th and Jamaica ranks 84th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.