Ghana vs Macau, China: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Ghana
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 0.3013 against 0.2323 in Ghana, a difference of 0.069.
That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.3 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 68th and Macau, China ranks 65th of 183 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0672 | 0.1551 | 0.0878 | Macau, China |
| 1990s | 0.0922 | 0.2683 | 0.1761 | Macau, China |
| 2000s | 0.1297 | 0.2316 | 0.1019 | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 0.1765 | 0.2742 | 0.0977 | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 0.2323 | 0.3013 | 0.0691 | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Ghana or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 0.3013 against 0.2323 in Ghana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Ghana and Macau, China?
- 0.069, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Macau, China?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Ghana and Macau, China rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Ghana ranks 68th and Macau, China ranks 65th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.