Ghana vs Slovenia: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Ghana
- Slovenia
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0.2323 against 0.1737 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0586.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.3 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Slovenia ahead.
Ghana ranks 68th and Slovenia ranks 71st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0672 | 0.056 | 0.0112 | Ghana |
| 1990s | 0.0922 | 0.4489 | 0.3566 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.1297 | 0.7735 | 0.6438 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.1765 | 0.3378 | 0.1613 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.2323 | 0.1737 | 0.0585 | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Ghana or Slovenia?
- Ghana, at 0.2323 against 0.1737 in Slovenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Ghana and Slovenia?
- 0.0586, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Slovenia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Ghana and Slovenia rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Ghana ranks 68th and Slovenia ranks 71st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.