Japan vs United States: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Japan
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 0.6558 against 0.6155 in Japan, a difference of 0.0403.
That makes United States's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 23rd and United States ranks 21st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and United States in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1292 | 0.0827 | 0.0465 | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.3155 | 0.416 | 0.1005 | United States |
| 2000s | 0.4736 | 0.6625 | 0.1889 | United States |
| 2010s | 0.4847 | 0.6302 | 0.1454 | United States |
| 2020s | 0.6155 | 0.6558 | 0.0403 | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Japan or United States?
- United States, at 0.6558 against 0.6155 in Japan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Japan and United States?
- 0.0403, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United States?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Japan and United States rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Japan ranks 23rd and United States ranks 21st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.