Jordan vs South Korea: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Jordan
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0.4802 against 0.4444 in Jordan, a difference of 0.0358.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 48th and South Korea ranks 46th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and South Korea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5326 | 0.1542 | 0.3784 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.5277 | 0.2613 | 0.2664 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.5041 | 0.7966 | 0.2925 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 0.4668 | 0.6715 | 0.2047 | South Korea |
| 2020s | 0.4444 | 0.4802 | 0.0359 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Jordan or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 0.4802 against 0.4444 in Jordan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Jordan and South Korea?
- 0.0358, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Korea?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Jordan and South Korea rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Jordan ranks 48th and South Korea ranks 46th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.