Kyrgyzstan vs Paraguay: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Paraguay
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.0174 against 0.0151 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0023.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Paraguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th and Paraguay ranks 97th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0334 | 0.0334 | Paraguay |
| 1990s | 0.0064 | 0.0506 | 0.0442 | Paraguay |
| 2000s | 0.0143 | 0.0449 | 0.0306 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 0.0193 | 0.0254 | 0.0062 | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0.0174 | 0.0151 | 0.0022 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Kyrgyzstan or Paraguay?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.0174 against 0.0151 in Paraguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Kyrgyzstan and Paraguay?
- 0.0023, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Paraguay?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Paraguay rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th and Paraguay ranks 97th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.