Latvia vs Lithuania: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Latvia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0778 against 0.0573 in Latvia, a difference of 0.0205.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.4 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Lithuania ahead.
Latvia ranks 80th and Lithuania ranks 77th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1990s | 0.0332 | 0.0448 | 0.0116 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.0913 | 0.0641 | 0.0272 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.1167 | 0.0488 | 0.0679 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0573 | 0.0778 | 0.0205 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Latvia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.0778 against 0.0573 in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Latvia and Lithuania?
- 0.0205, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lithuania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Latvia and Lithuania rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Latvia ranks 80th and Lithuania ranks 77th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.