Mongolia vs Portugal: Financial Markets Access Index
Financial Markets Access Index over time
- Mongolia
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 0.1682 against 0.0994 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0688.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.7 times Mongolia's.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 75th and Portugal ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0164 | 0.0164 | Portugal |
| 1990s | 0.0109 | 0.1579 | 0.147 | Portugal |
| 2000s | 0.0288 | 0.2524 | 0.2235 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 0.0589 | 0.238 | 0.1791 | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0.0994 | 0.1682 | 0.0688 | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets access index, Mongolia or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 0.1682 against 0.0994 in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets access index between Mongolia and Portugal?
- 0.0688, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Portugal?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Portugal rank globally for financial markets access index?
- Mongolia ranks 75th and Portugal ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.