All Countries vs Switzerland: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- All Countries
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 0.9877 against 0.2315 in All Countries, a difference of 0.7562.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 4.3 times All Countries's.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
All Countries ranks 4th and Switzerland ranks 3rd of 9 groups.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | All Countries | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.061 | 0.4257 | 0.3647 | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 0.1141 | 0.7186 | 0.6045 | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 0.1929 | 0.922 | 0.7291 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 0.2146 | 0.9877 | 0.7732 | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 0.2315 | 0.9877 | 0.7562 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, All Countries or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 0.9877 against 0.2315 in All Countries as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between All Countries and Switzerland?
- 0.7562, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for All Countries and Switzerland?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do All Countries and Switzerland rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- All Countries ranks 4th and Switzerland ranks 3rd of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.