Angola vs Uzbekistan: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Angola
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.1573 against 0.1417 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.0156.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Angola ranks 77th and Uzbekistan ranks 80th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.0796 | 0.0077 | 0.072 | Angola |
| 2000s | 0.1316 | 0.0142 | 0.1174 | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.0682 | 0.075 | 0.0068 | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.1573 | 0.1417 | 0.0156 | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Angola or Uzbekistan?
- Angola, at 0.1573 against 0.1417 in Uzbekistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Angola and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0156, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Uzbekistan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Angola and Uzbekistan rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Angola ranks 77th and Uzbekistan ranks 80th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.