Aruba vs Eswatini: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Aruba
- Eswatini
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.0201 against 0.0167 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0034.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Eswatini ahead.
Aruba ranks 129th and Eswatini ranks 131st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0011 | 0.0632 | 0.0621 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.0024 | 0.0741 | 0.0718 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.0038 | 0.0174 | 0.0137 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.015 | 0.0167 | 0.0017 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0201 | 0.0167 | 0.0034 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Aruba or Eswatini?
- Aruba, at 0.0201 against 0.0167 in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Aruba and Eswatini?
- 0.0034, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Eswatini?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Aruba and Eswatini rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Aruba ranks 129th and Eswatini ranks 131st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.