Azerbaijan vs Czechia: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Azerbaijan
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.1611 against 0.1512 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.0099.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Czechia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Czechia ranks 76th of 183 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1990s | 0.0382 | 0.0848 | 0.0466 | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.0662 | 0.1635 | 0.0973 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.1087 | 0.1896 | 0.0809 | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.1512 | 0.1611 | 0.0099 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Azerbaijan or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 0.1611 against 0.1512 in Azerbaijan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Azerbaijan and Czechia?
- 0.0099, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Czechia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Azerbaijan and Czechia rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Czechia ranks 76th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.