Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Hungary: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Azerbaijan, Republic of
- Hungary
How they compare
Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 0.1512 against 0.1445 in Hungary, a difference of 0.0067.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Hungary ahead.
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 78th and Hungary ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Azerbaijan, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan, Republic of | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.041 | 0.041 | Hungary |
| 1990s | 0.0382 | 0.0748 | 0.0366 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 0.0662 | 0.243 | 0.1768 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.1087 | 0.1861 | 0.0774 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.1512 | 0.1445 | 0.0067 | Azerbaijan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Hungary?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 0.1512 against 0.1445 in Hungary as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Hungary?
- 0.0067, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Hungary?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Hungary rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 78th and Hungary ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.