Bangladesh vs Slovenia: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Bangladesh
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.0972 against 0.0957 in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.0015.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 89th and Slovenia ranks 88th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0047 | 0 | 0.0047 | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 0.0148 | 0.0408 | 0.026 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.0393 | 0.2066 | 0.1672 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.1075 | 0.1319 | 0.0244 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.0957 | 0.0972 | 0.0015 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Bangladesh or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0.0972 against 0.0957 in Bangladesh as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Bangladesh and Slovenia?
- 0.0015, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Slovenia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bangladesh and Slovenia rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Bangladesh ranks 89th and Slovenia ranks 88th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.