Benin vs North Macedonia: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Benin
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Benin currently reports 0.016 against 0.0136 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0024.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 132nd and North Macedonia ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 4 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0408 | 0 | 0.0408 | Benin |
| 1990s | 0.0166 | 0.0057 | 0.0109 | Benin |
| 2000s | 0.0106 | 0.0121 | 0.0016 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 0.0155 | 0.0146 | 0.0009 | Benin |
| 2020s | 0.016 | 0.0136 | 0.0024 | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Benin or North Macedonia?
- Benin, at 0.016 against 0.0136 in North Macedonia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Benin and North Macedonia?
- 0.0024, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and North Macedonia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Benin and North Macedonia rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Benin ranks 132nd and North Macedonia ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.