Cape Verde vs Cambodia: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Cape Verde
- Cambodia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.0062 against 0.0057 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0005.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 146th and Cambodia ranks 144th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Cambodia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.003 | 0 | 0.003 | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 0.0048 | 0.0022 | 0.0026 | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.0049 | 0.0044 | 0.0005 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 0.0056 | 0.0221 | 0.0164 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.0057 | 0.0062 | 0.0005 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Cape Verde or Cambodia?
- Cambodia, at 0.0062 against 0.0057 in Cape Verde as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Cape Verde and Cambodia?
- 0.0005, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Cambodia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Cape Verde and Cambodia rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Cape Verde ranks 146th and Cambodia ranks 144th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.