Cambodia vs Kyrgyzstan: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Cambodia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.0062 against 0.0052 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.001.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Cambodia ranks 144th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.0022 | 0.0298 | 0.0277 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.0044 | 0.0303 | 0.0259 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 0.0221 | 0.0052 | 0.0168 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.0062 | 0.0052 | 0.0011 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Cambodia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Cambodia, at 0.0062 against 0.0052 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Cambodia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.001, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Cambodia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Cambodia ranks 144th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.