Colombia vs Indonesia: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Colombia
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.2593 against 0.2577 in Colombia, a difference of 0.0016.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Indonesia ahead.
Colombia ranks 58th and Indonesia ranks 56th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Indonesia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.042 | 0.1511 | 0.1092 | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 0.085 | 0.1974 | 0.1124 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.1905 | 0.174 | 0.0165 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 0.2378 | 0.2282 | 0.0096 | Colombia |
| 2020s | 0.2577 | 0.2593 | 0.0016 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Colombia or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 0.2593 against 0.2577 in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Colombia and Indonesia?
- 0.0016, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Indonesia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Indonesia rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Colombia ranks 58th and Indonesia ranks 56th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.