Costa Rica vs Turkmenistan: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Costa Rica
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.0571 against 0.0558 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0013.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 104th and Turkmenistan ranks 105th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0154 | 0 | 0.0154 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.0214 | 0.0146 | 0.0068 | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.0465 | 0.0588 | 0.0123 | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 0.0596 | 0.0573 | 0.0023 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.0571 | 0.0558 | 0.0013 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Costa Rica or Turkmenistan?
- Costa Rica, at 0.0571 against 0.0558 in Turkmenistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Costa Rica and Turkmenistan?
- 0.0013, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Turkmenistan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Turkmenistan rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Costa Rica ranks 104th and Turkmenistan ranks 105th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.