Denmark vs United Arab Emirates: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Denmark
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.6549 against 0.6307 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.0242.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Denmark ranks 25th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 183 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0837 | 0.0231 | 0.0607 | Denmark |
| 1990s | 0.2374 | 0.0635 | 0.174 | Denmark |
| 2000s | 0.485 | 0.3278 | 0.1572 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 0.6413 | 0.5268 | 0.1145 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.6549 | 0.6307 | 0.0243 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Denmark or United Arab Emirates?
- Denmark, at 0.6549 against 0.6307 in United Arab Emirates as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Denmark and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0242, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and United Arab Emirates?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Denmark and United Arab Emirates rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Denmark ranks 25th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.