Emerging Markets vs Sweden: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Emerging Markets
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.9434 against 0.225 in Emerging Markets, a difference of 0.7184.
That makes Sweden's figure about 4.2 times Emerging Markets's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Emerging Markets ahead.
Emerging Markets ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 8th of 9 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Emerging Markets | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0619 | 0.1502 | 0.0884 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 0.1037 | 0.4951 | 0.3915 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.1701 | 0.9005 | 0.7304 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.1916 | 0.9403 | 0.7487 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.225 | 0.9434 | 0.7184 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Emerging Markets or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.9434 against 0.225 in Emerging Markets as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Emerging Markets and Sweden?
- 0.7184, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Emerging Markets and Sweden?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Emerging Markets and Sweden rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Emerging Markets ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 8th of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.