Eswatini vs Sierra Leone: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Eswatini
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0167 against 0.013 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0037.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 134th of 183 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0632 | 0.0014 | 0.0618 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.0741 | 0.0024 | 0.0717 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.0174 | 0.006 | 0.0114 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0167 | 0.0154 | 0.0013 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0167 | 0.013 | 0.0036 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Eswatini or Sierra Leone?
- Eswatini, at 0.0167 against 0.013 in Sierra Leone as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Eswatini and Sierra Leone?
- 0.0037, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sierra Leone?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Eswatini and Sierra Leone rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Eswatini ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 134th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.