France vs South Korea: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- France
- South Korea
How they compare
France currently reports 0.9082 against 0.8193 in South Korea, a difference of 0.0889.
That makes France's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was South Korea ahead.
France ranks 10th and South Korea ranks 11th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, France averaged higher in 3 and South Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0789 | 0.1083 | 0.0294 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 0.2949 | 0.3039 | 0.009 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 0.8447 | 0.592 | 0.2527 | France |
| 2010s | 0.8732 | 0.7842 | 0.089 | France |
| 2020s | 0.9082 | 0.8193 | 0.0889 | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, France or South Korea?
- France, at 0.9082 against 0.8193 in South Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between France and South Korea?
- 0.0889, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and South Korea?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do France and South Korea rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- France ranks 10th and South Korea ranks 11th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.