Gabon vs Lithuania: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Gabon
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0395 against 0.0322 in Gabon, a difference of 0.0073.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 118th and Lithuania ranks 115th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0027 | 0 | 0.0027 | Gabon |
| 1990s | 0.0031 | 0.0066 | 0.0036 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.006 | 0.0265 | 0.0205 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.023 | 0.0337 | 0.0108 | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.0322 | 0.0395 | 0.0073 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Gabon or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.0395 against 0.0322 in Gabon as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Gabon and Lithuania?
- 0.0073, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Lithuania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Gabon and Lithuania rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Gabon ranks 118th and Lithuania ranks 115th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.