Georgia vs Romania: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Georgia
- Romania
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.0694 against 0.064 in Romania, a difference of 0.0054.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Romania ahead.
Georgia ranks 97th and Romania ranks 100th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0042 | 0.0042 | Romania |
| 1990s | 0.0049 | 0.01 | 0.0051 | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.0136 | 0.0468 | 0.0332 | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.0673 | 0.0503 | 0.017 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.0694 | 0.064 | 0.0054 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Georgia or Romania?
- Georgia, at 0.0694 against 0.064 in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Georgia and Romania?
- 0.0054, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Romania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Romania rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Georgia ranks 97th and Romania ranks 100th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.