Grenada vs Mozambique, Republic of: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Grenada
- Mozambique, Republic of
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0.2552 against 0.245 in Mozambique, Republic of, a difference of 0.0102.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 59th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 60th of 183 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Mozambique, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1524 | 0 | 0.1524 | Grenada |
| 1990s | 0.2154 | 0.0196 | 0.1957 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0.2319 | 0.0547 | 0.1771 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0.2194 | 0.0776 | 0.1418 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.2552 | 0.245 | 0.0102 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Grenada or Mozambique, Republic of?
- Grenada, at 0.2552 against 0.245 in Mozambique, Republic of as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Grenada and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 0.0102, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Grenada and Mozambique, Republic of rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Grenada ranks 59th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 60th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.