Guatemala vs Tanzania: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Guatemala
- Tanzania
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.028 against 0.0275 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0005.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 119th and Tanzania ranks 120th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0153 | 0.0412 | 0.0259 | Tanzania |
| 1990s | 0.0076 | 0.0282 | 0.0206 | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 0.0126 | 0.0121 | 0.0006 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.019 | 0.0159 | 0.0031 | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.028 | 0.0275 | 0.0005 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Guatemala or Tanzania?
- Guatemala, at 0.028 against 0.0275 in Tanzania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Guatemala and Tanzania?
- 0.0005, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Tanzania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Guatemala and Tanzania rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Guatemala ranks 119th and Tanzania ranks 120th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.