Iceland vs Lebanon: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Iceland
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0.3458 against 0.3281 in Iceland, a difference of 0.0177.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Lebanon ahead.
Iceland ranks 52nd and Lebanon ranks 49th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0265 | 0.0569 | 0.0304 | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 0.125 | 0.079 | 0.046 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0.4426 | 0.1718 | 0.2707 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.409 | 0.1854 | 0.2236 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.3281 | 0.3458 | 0.0177 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Iceland or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 0.3458 against 0.3281 in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Iceland and Lebanon?
- 0.0177, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Lebanon?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Lebanon rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Iceland ranks 52nd and Lebanon ranks 49th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.