Iceland vs Viet Nam: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Iceland
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.3281 against 0.3016 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.0265.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 52nd and Viet Nam ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0265 | 0 | 0.0265 | Iceland |
| 1990s | 0.125 | 0.0493 | 0.0757 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0.4426 | 0.1029 | 0.3397 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.409 | 0.2147 | 0.1943 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.3281 | 0.3016 | 0.0264 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Iceland or Viet Nam?
- Iceland, at 0.3281 against 0.3016 in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Iceland and Viet Nam?
- 0.0265, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Viet Nam?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Viet Nam rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Iceland ranks 52nd and Viet Nam ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.