Indonesia vs Mongolia: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Indonesia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.296 against 0.2593 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0367.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 56th and Mongolia ranks 54th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 4 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1511 | 0 | 0.1511 | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 0.1974 | 0.0117 | 0.1856 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.174 | 0.027 | 0.147 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0.2282 | 0.2228 | 0.0054 | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 0.2593 | 0.296 | 0.0367 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Indonesia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.296 against 0.2593 in Indonesia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Indonesia and Mongolia?
- 0.0367, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Mongolia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Indonesia and Mongolia rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Indonesia ranks 56th and Mongolia ranks 54th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.