Indonesia vs Viet Nam: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Indonesia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 0.3016 against 0.2593 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0423.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 56th and Viet Nam ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 4 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1511 | 0 | 0.1511 | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 0.1974 | 0.0493 | 0.1481 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.174 | 0.1029 | 0.0711 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0.2282 | 0.2147 | 0.0135 | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 0.2593 | 0.3016 | 0.0423 | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Indonesia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 0.3016 against 0.2593 in Indonesia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Indonesia and Viet Nam?
- 0.0423, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Viet Nam?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Indonesia and Viet Nam rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Indonesia ranks 56th and Viet Nam ranks 53rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.